Fascial versus fascio-cutaneous pedicled sural flaps in the reconstruction of distal leg, ankle and foot soft tissue defects

BACKGROUND: The coverage of soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle or foot poses several challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. Reconstructive procedures may range from simple skin grafting to complicated free tissue transfers. The reverse sural flap has been one of the most dependable methods for soft tissue coverage of such complex wounds. The purpose of this paper was to compare the clinical results of reverse sural flaps harvested with a fascial versus a fasciocutaneous pedicle. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of twenty-six patients who underwent a reverse sural flap procedure for complex wounds of the distal lower extremity was examined from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2009, with a minimum follow-up of one month. Fifteen patients had a fascial pedicled flap, while eleven patients had fasciocutaneous pedicled flaps with a minimum of one month follow-up. The primary outcome was flap-related complications. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the differences between the two groups and the level of significance was set at p?0.05. RESULTS: All flaps survived. Flap-related complications were more common in the fascial pedicled flap (6/15) compared with the fasciocutaneous pedicled flap (1/11). The difference was not significant (p=0.09). In terms of cosmetic acceptability, 11 patients (11/15) in the fascial pedicle group and five patients (5/11) in the fasciocutaneous pedicle group expressed that the sural flap was acceptable. CONCLUSION: Reverse sural flap was a reliable reconstructive procedure for coverage of soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle or foot. There was no significant difference in terms of complication rates for those with fascial compared with those with fasciocutaneous flaps. Cosmetic acceptability was higher for the fascial pedicled flap.

Vascularized proximal fibular epiphyseal transfer for shoulder reconstruction after tumor resection

We present a case of an 8-year-old girl with a high grade osteogenic sarcoma of the proximal humerus treated with wide resection and vascularized proximal humerus treated with wide resection and vascularized proximal fibular epiphyseal transfer. At 5 years after reconstruction, the patient is tumor free and had a Musculoskeletal Tumor Score of 26/30 or 86.7%. The functional outcomes in terms of shoulder range of motion and pain were good. Complications include transient peroneal nerve palsy and mild valgus instability of the knee.

Anatomic study of the biceps and brachialis branch of the musculocutaneous nerve for brachial plexus reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to define the anatomy of the musculocutaneous nerve as it innervates the biceps and brachialis muscles in relation to nerve transfer surgery in brachial plexus injury.METHODS: Surgical dissection of the musculocutaneous nerve of both upper extremities of 34 embalmed cadavers was performed to define the anatomy of the musculocutaneous nerve as it supplies the biceps and the brachial muscles. Among the data that we noted were the distance where the branch of the biceps and branchialis took off from the musculocutaneous nerve from the coracoids, which was the bony landmark.RESULTS: There were 17 males and 17 females with a total of 65 musculocutaneous nerve to biceps muscle had an average distance of 10.9cm and a median of 11.0cm±1.83cm (range, 6.5-14.2 cm) from the coracoid. The branching of musculocutaneous nerve to the brachialis had an average distance of 15.1 cm and a median 15.5cm±1.72cm (range, 12.7-21.0cm) from the coracoid. Transferring the fascicles of the ulnar nerve to the biceps branch and a fascicle of the median nerve to the brachialis branch is fairly easy since both nerves are within the vicinity of respective recipient site.CONCLUSION: The anatomy of the musculocutaneous nerve as it supplies the elbow flexors is fairly consistent and there is little discrepancy between cadaveric specimens.